Since it dipped well below freezing last night and was only forcast to hit 40 degrees F for a high today three of us decided to run the two mile loop of the perimeter of a nearby regional mall since the 20% of clear sky provided some warmth to this asphalt heat island.
It was perfect, high 30's but our feet were fine.
No real runners, just my wife, our friend, and myself, but all of us true barefoot.
Easy slow 10MM pace, everybody happy. We had even walked the mall barefoot first for some shopping (I tagged along).
The run was fun, but mall security spotted us after a bit and demanded that we show some shoes!
No problems running the lot, just an order to put on shoes and show them immediately or the real police would be called. We laughed him off, but he followed us until we finished. Three security vehicles surrounded ours, and then the city police officer moved in for the confrontation.
The mall security stood by the shoes rule, while the city officer changed it to "no running allowed"
I tried to get it straight but when the real cop said "are you arguing with me?" I backed down.
He said "They (the security guards) own this mall as well as the parking lot, so they make the rules".
I said "no, they are security guards hired by the management of the mall, which I am a part owner of being a shareholder of the real estate investment trust that owns this property"
He demanded my I.D. which I refused to show him, while Diane and Patrice chatted in the van.
I double checked by phone with my attorney and once again told the officer that I was not required to show I.D. since I had done nothing wrong.
Ended up enjoying a barefoot restaurtant lunch, and then returned to a mall store barefoot so Diane could purchase a coat she had earlier spotted.
So I guess I'm still unclear.....RUNNING was the problem, not being barefoot?
Strange turn of events.
It was perfect, high 30's but our feet were fine.
No real runners, just my wife, our friend, and myself, but all of us true barefoot.
Easy slow 10MM pace, everybody happy. We had even walked the mall barefoot first for some shopping (I tagged along).
The run was fun, but mall security spotted us after a bit and demanded that we show some shoes!
No problems running the lot, just an order to put on shoes and show them immediately or the real police would be called. We laughed him off, but he followed us until we finished. Three security vehicles surrounded ours, and then the city police officer moved in for the confrontation.
The mall security stood by the shoes rule, while the city officer changed it to "no running allowed"
I tried to get it straight but when the real cop said "are you arguing with me?" I backed down.
He said "They (the security guards) own this mall as well as the parking lot, so they make the rules".
I said "no, they are security guards hired by the management of the mall, which I am a part owner of being a shareholder of the real estate investment trust that owns this property"
He demanded my I.D. which I refused to show him, while Diane and Patrice chatted in the van.
I double checked by phone with my attorney and once again told the officer that I was not required to show I.D. since I had done nothing wrong.
Ended up enjoying a barefoot restaurtant lunch, and then returned to a mall store barefoot so Diane could purchase a coat she had earlier spotted.
So I guess I'm still unclear.....RUNNING was the problem, not being barefoot?
Strange turn of events.