Just wondering if anyone here has experience of sprinting barefoot, eg 100m? If so did you have any issues with traction, loading on the feet, abrasion etc compared to running shod?
Not in a sprint race (yet). I did a 60 and 100 meter race on Saturday in thin soled shoes, and will try spikes next time as a benchmark, then barefoot after that for comparison. I did have a try sprinting barefoot on the track after the race and it felt ok, but I think I'd need to do it in a race to get a real perspective on it. I should add I am comfortable running barefoot over long distances, but just wanted to respect the difference in sprinting and seek to draw from from others experiences along the way.
So what was your experience barefootandagile?
Regards
Rob
Well as intended I went away and bought the running spikes and went back last weekend and clocked the following benchmark times (Mondo track, electronic timing, No Wind Indicated):
60m: 8.20s
100m: 12.78s
Both runs felt good, reasonably quick start etc. So I went back today to sprint barefoot and this is what I got (same track, also No Wind Indicated):
60m: 8.13s
100m: 12.79s
So the 60m, where you would think the spikes would give the biggest advantage was actually faster barefoot! And the 100m was practically no difference... I'm not sure if I should be happy that barefoot sprinting appears to be so viable, or sad that I've just seemingly wasted $100 on sprinting spikes!
Noted this is a small sample set to draw conclusions from, but both runs felt comparable and there was no wind differential so at face value barefoot sprinting looks like a go-er. I should add that my soles felt fine (and if anything they are a little out of condition at the moment as I have been taking a training break the past 8 weeks). I have set some sprint time goals for the next 17 months so will probably continue to clock times both shod and unshod and see if any differences start to show as I get faster (assuming I manage to do so)